Space for Cycling - 2014 Local Election Campaign Policy

six policy themes

London Cycling Campaign trustee and sustainable transport academic Dr Rachel Aldred explains what policies underpin our 2014 Local Election Campaign.

22 May 2014 is the next time that the whole of Greater London re-elects its local councillors, who are the key decision-makers on local street design. They, more than anyone else, have the power to make our local streets more cycle-friendly.

We want to ensure providing safe space for cycling is a major issue during the local elections, and is on the agenda of incoming ward councillors.

The Mayor's Vision for Cycling promises a lot, but achieving that positive change depends on strong political leadership at many levels, including from borough councils.

That's why in 2014 we will be calling on every candidate in every ward across central, inner and outer London to support pro-cycling policies and measures.

Over the last year, the elected London Cycling Campaign Policy Forum has developed six policy themes, which we feel are most important to make your neighbourhood safe and inviting for everyone to cycle:

  1. Safer Routes for schoolchildren
  2. Areas without through motor traffic
  3. Protected space on main roads/major junctions
  4. Safe cycle routes via parks and canals 
  5. 20mph speed limits
  6. Liveable town centres

With your help, we have identified a single measure for each ward (the smallest electoral sub-division): this single measure is based on one of our policy themes, and we'll lobby incumbent councillors and candidates to commit to putting that measure in place.

Some themes will be more relevant to a particular ward than others: for example, some wards have a school in them and some don't, while in some wards there will be existing campaigns that will fit well with our agenda.

Campaigning at ward level will mean our campaign is truly 'local' while at the same time promoting broader LCC policies that benefit the entire city.

However, all the themes are linked to creating the kind of cycling conditions that are hospitable to the young, the old, the nervous and the wobbly, as well as existing cyclists.

Our key aim is to guarantee safe space for cycling for Londoners of all ages and abilities.

Our six policy themes

Our six policy themes are the kinds of measures already shown to work in high-cycling cities and countries, and we want to see all these measures consistently applied across London.

This campaign is our opportunity to put the ideas on the table at a local level, and build support for them locally.

It's important that we get across the message that these measures will not only be good for people who cycle now (they will); they're also helpful in getting many more people cycling, and are also good for non-cyclists in that they help make our neighbourhoods more pleasant and prosperous places for everyone.

Read about how our policy themes might apply in your local area

1. Safe Routes for schoolchildren
Only 1% of schoolchildren's journeys are currently made by bike in London, although many more children and young people would like to ride. Our national child obesity levels are among the highest in Europe, and many of London's children have relatively little play space at home.

Cycling and walking to school are good for children's physical and mental health; less driving on the school run will make the streets safer and nicer for all.

We'll be asking candidates to support measures to enable cycling to school, for example by installing a Toucan to enable children to cross a busy road between an estate and the local school.

2. Areas without through motor traffic
Areas where motor traffic cannot cut through side streets, while walking and cycling are encouraged. Through point closures (using bollards, planters, or trees), a residential area can be filtered, so that all parts can still be reached by motor vehicle (for deliveries, or to start or end journeys) but direct routes across quiet zones are only possible by non-motorised modes.

Such areas are more pleasant and liveable for residents, without stopping them reaching their homes by car, if need be. However, when an area is made safer, quieter, and more pleasant, walking and cycling become more attractive choices. You could ask candidates to implement these measures within your ward.

3. Protected Space on Main Roads 
Quiet zones help keep through motor traffic away from residential streets. But often people will need to cycle along main roads: because that’s where shops and workplaces are, or because they are the most direct routes.

Currently, most main roads make cyclists mix with heavy and/or fast moving motor traffic, which most people find scary. Dedicated space for cycling on main roads gives people of all ages and abilities access to the whole road network by bicycle.

It can benefit local communities and economies, helping more people get to shopping parades and other facilities without having to drive.

You could ask candidates to support installing dedicated infrastructure on a local main road, or to support the upgrade of currently inadequate or incomplete provision.

4. Greenways
London’s Greenway network should be a fantastic local resource; pleasant and safe routes that are a joy to travel. Greenways provide some of the most appealing cycling environments, attracting groups currently under-represented among London cyclists (for example, older people).

People use them for all kinds of purposes: from commuting to work, to weekend family outings, to shopping trips. But our Greenway network is incomplete. Many planned routes have not been completed, and many gaps remain. Even some completed parts are problematic for cycling; for example, where barriers or poor surfacing exclude disabled cyclists and those carrying children.

You could ask candidates to complete a local link, or to improve conditions in an existing section.

5. 20mph speed limits 
Increasingly it is accepted that 20mph speed limits save lives, and they are being implemented on residential roads across many London boroughs. Where cyclists must share space with motor traffic, reducing the speed differential is important: both for reducing the risk of death and injury, and for creating more pleasant cycling and walking environments. Yet many parts of London are still 30mph; although it's great to see boroughs adopting 20mph limits often it's only on 'residential roads', meaning that local high streets can still carry inappropriately fast traffic.

You could ask candidates to support the extension of 20mph to a local high street, or where 20mph already exists locally, for enforcement where needed.

6. Liveable Town Centres
Many of London's high streets and town centres have become run down, congested traffic arteries. As the internet transforms our shopping habits, town centres have suffered but they can be revitalised. They need to be places where people want to spend time, meet friends, enjoy social activity and access a variety of services.

To build liveable town centres, we need to prioritise people over motor traffic, creating space that can be enjoyed by the local community and that encourages walking and cycling. This can create lively, pleasant places that are economically viable and socially vibrant.

How does the campaign work in reality?

Case study 1: Making Regent's Park an area without through motor traffic
Local LCC group, Camden Cyclists, has developed various proposals for improving the Outer Circle in Regent’s Park, by cutting down the amount of through traffic using the Circle, and reducing speeds. Using planters or bollards, motor traffic could be stopped from using the Outer Circle as a through route. While this would dramatically reduce motor traffic, deliveries could still be made to the Zoo and other destinations, and people could still park cars or be dropped off.

Using this approach here would create a much more pleasant and less polluted atmosphere, suitable for all ages and abilities, not just the fast and the confident. What is currently a barrier for walking and cycling would become an enabler; a useful new route and a more liveable space that would form part of the Park, not a motor cordon around it. Changes could initially be made as a trial.

Case Study 2: Protected Space for Cycling on Superhighway 2
Cycle Superhighway 2 is currently being extended from Bow to Stratford, to quite high standards. But the rest of Cycle Superhighway 2, between Aldgate and Bow, provides cyclists with virtually no dedicated space, merely blue paint on the road which provides no legal or physical protection. Conditions are frightening and junctions unsafe: yet, this is supposed to be a key part of London's cycle route network linking Newham, Tower Hamlets and the City.

Upgrading CS2 to Dutch standards means creating wide, separated space for cycling, with speedy and safe passage through junctions. A Dutch quality CS2 would open up cycling for all, from Royal London hospital workers, to local schoolchildren visiting friends, to pensioners visiting Whitechapel market.

About the Policy Forum

The LCC’s Policy Forum meets quarterly, reviewing and developing LCC’s policy positions. It’s been developing ways to evaluate the quality of cycling infrastructure, like the ‘Love London, Go Dutch Matrix’, which is a tool to examine cycle safety at junctions (eg, Aldgate). Other current work covers policy on inclusive cycling, and when we need protected space for cycling.

We organise a regular free policy seminar series, open to all, which was launched on 8 April 2013 with Andrew Gilligan and Danny Williams. Seminars cover topics such as the London Cycle Design Standards and gaining political support for LCC’s policies. 

Please contact for more on the Policy Forum. You can get involved in a variety of ways – by attending meetings, getting involved in our work, and/or standing for election to the Forum in January 2014. You can also make a donation by credit/debit card by visting 


  • By Frood42 at 11:28am 28 November 2013

Some of this does sound good, I think the number one policy should be Liveable Town Centres which put people first and traffic second.


Why do these councils still insist on car centric ideas like lowering car parking prices to try and get people back into town centres? One reason I avoid town centres and use larger shopping centres is because I have not got to cross roads clogged with traffic or have to stand around in the cold while those in heated vehicles get priority...


I do however have to disagree with LCC on the CS2 extension from Bow to Stratford, this has NOT been done to a high standard, it is yet another example of infrastructure which still prioritises traffic flow over all else.


The idea WAS a good one, and I WAS looking forward to finally seeing it and trying it out, but the implementation has been poor, and it seems that TFL and the councils have yet to learn anything... and all this despite the debacle that has been the blue paint that has been splattered all over Londons roads, were any lessons learned?


If we are going to put in such infrastructure as what we hoped the CS2 extension was going to be, and not what it became, lets get it right first time, otherwise we are going to be left with sub-standard infrastructure like that for the next 20 years or more...


It also doesn't tackle the real problem of Bow Roundabout, which is especially terrible for pedestrians...


My biggest problem with the CS2 extension?

It doesn't SLOW traffic down at junctions.

You still get people who think it is ok to not slow down and turn left across the cycle lane without checking properly, these may be few in number, but this risk could have been further lowered with proper implementation to dutch standards.


This is not my ONLY concern.

See here for more details on this attempt at a cycle lane:


Can I ask, where does this CS2 extensions actually go? It seems to start nowhere and end nowhere, dumping you out into a three lane one way system or a terrible designed rounabout...


Oh deary, deary me. Why are these people so short sighted and blinded, there are no real facilites for people at Westfield Stratford City, so there is no destination, at best this short piece of cycle lane is a pass through for commuters who have braved the three lane one way system or the dodgy Bow roundabout. 


Sorry to be so negative, but I just don't get why these people have such poor and narrow vision of what could have been.


The article below may be an April 1st joke but it does suggest an intriguing proposition. What if, instead of having to choose between the candidates offered, everyone could nominate their *own* candidate. *Anyone* in the EU could be nominated, and whoever got the *most* nominations would be offered the post, regardless of party, nationality, etc. Mmm? If we can't join the Netherlands, let's elect a mayor, councillors, etc, who *will* put people first! And really Dutch it up. More Demo.. less ocracy!

Post a reply

Sign in to post a reply.