Police and Transport for London prepare to increase enforcement against motorists who ignore Advanced Stop Lines
- By London Cycling Campaign on at 04:46pm 02 Jul 2013
- Posted in: Blog
- Tagged with: transport for london, Advanced Stop Lines, bike box, ASL, metropolitan police, garry meakins, LFGSS
The Metropolitan Police and Transport for London are preparing to increase enforcement against motorists who ignore Advanced Stop Lines (photo: Toby Jacobs).
This week, 60,000 leaflets are being handed out to motorists at key junctions telling them to respect Advanced Stop Lines or face a £60 fine and three points on their licence.
The on-street education for motorists is being accompanied by targeted advertising to taxi and bus drivers, and a Transport for London source has told us: “We expect a shift into an ‘enforcement’ phase soon, at locations to be determined by intelligence.”
LCC’s road danger expert Charlie Lloyd said:
“Police data shows that around two-thirds of collisions involving cyclists and motorists are the fault of the motorist, and sustained enforcement of Advanced Stop Lines, as well as other serious motoring offences, is essential to reduce the harm caused to people riding bicycles.”
While ASLs alone can’t make a dangerous junction safe, there’s substantial evidence that giving cyclists space at the front of junctions reduces risk by making them more visible to motorists and giving extra time for them to pull away.
Advanced Stop Lines, also know as ASLs or bike boxes, are areas on the carriageway at the front junctions provided solely for cyclists, marked by a bicycle symbol.
ASLs in London are frequently obstructed by cars, buses, lorries and motorbikes, negating much of the safety benefit they provide.
The Highway Code says a motor vehicle may cross an ASL only when the traffic light is yellow or green, but not when the light is red, in which case the driver would be liable to an on-the-spot punishment.
Driver found not guilty after running over bicycle in ASL
Garry Meakins has been found not guilty of dangerous driving and causing actual bodily harm even though a witness spoke in court how he drove his van into a victim who had to leap clear as his bicycle was crushed under the wheels of the defendant’s van.
The jury heard that the victim and the defendant had been involved in an exchange of words in the moments before the incident, an argument that centred around the van illegally encroaching into the ASL.
When the lights turned green, the witness said Meakins drove his van into the cyclist, who narrowly escaped injury, but a jury decided there was no intent to cause harm on the part of the driver.
The case was reported by the witness on the LFGSS forum.