Skip navigation

Women's Freedom After Dark Report

Women's Freedom After Dark report finds nearly a quarter of the total length of TfL’s cycle network is ‘socially unsafe’ after dark.

A report from the London Cycling Campaign Women’s Network, supported by Forest, the shared e-bike service, and Madison, the UK’s leading distributor of cycle parts and accessories, reveals the extent of unsafe routes for women in the TfL cycle network.

Nearly a quarter of the total length of TfL’s Cycleway network is ‘socially unsafe’ after dark – in other words there is a risk of harm from other people – such as stretches through unlit parks, industrial estates or alongside canals with no escape routes.

In addition, our analysis shows that over half of all TfL Cycleways have at least one socially unsafe section, 11 Cycleways are over 70% unsafe, and seven are 100% unsafe after dark.

Lack of safety after dark is a formidable barrier to cycling for women.

Our previous report What Stops Women Cycling in London? found one in three women of over 1,000 surveyed stopped cycling altogether after dark or in winter, due to a lack of safe routes.

While it’s not surprising to find this barrier where good cycle infrastructure is still lacking, such as most of outer London, we should not expect to find it on TfL’s official Cycleways.

AFTER DARK MAP

Supported by
Forest and Madison logos

Freedom After Dark: The Numbers

24%

Percentage of TfL’s Cycleway network is socially unsafe after dark - 85 km in total

58%

Percentage of TfL’s Cycleways have at least one socially unsafe segment

11

Number of cycleways which are socially unsafe for 70% or more of their length

Youtube preview
See the BBC News coverage
To make cycling a mass form of sustainable transport in London, we need a city-wide cycle network that is safe all day and all year round. 
TfL should add ‘social safety’ to its Cycle Route Quality Criteria,

This would rule out poorly-lit, isolated areas – see our full criteria hereand ‘directness’, to rule out convoluted, indirect routes that are unsafe after dark.

TfL should urgently bring all current Cycleways up to the new quality criteria standard.

Sections of existing routes, or entire routes, should be upgraded or rerouted in order to meet the criteria.

TfL should not approve or fund council delivery of routes that do not meet the updated criteria.

Cycle routes through parks and so on are a valuable resource to be enjoyed – and can be delivered and funded by parks and others – but should not count as part of TfL’s core cycle network. Transport funding should be reserved for delivering strategic, inclusive Cycleways. 

TfL, councils and the police should also make leisure routes safer

This would be done with more CCTV and lighting in places like underpasses and routes that are isolated after dark, particularly at crime ‘hotspots’.

TfL (and Active Travel England) should develop new guidance on cycle infrastructure and social safety.

For instance, Dutch designs of bridges and underpasses could be adopted that are far more welcoming than British ones.

Emma Barnie

Two men tried to push me off my bike as I was going past Millwall stadium. I didn’t cycle for months after because I was so scared. I now cycle on the main road alongside cars. I don’t feel safe there but it’s not as traumatic.

Only a third of London Cycle journeys are made by women. In the Netherlands it's more than half. Support the campaign and help us demand Freedom To Ride.

We can't do this without you

LCC is highly effective because it's supported by more than 12,000 members. If you cycle in London please consider joining today. You'll be supporting our work and you'll get a huge range of benefits.

KEEP UP TO DATE

All the latest cycling news, campaigns and information straight to your inbox.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.