London and Paris — two beautiful cities, just 300 miles apart, sharing so many historical links and, generally, progressive attitudes.
In the last 10 to 15 years both cities have been addressing interwoven issues around climate action, air quality, transport infrastructure and improvements to the public realm. Cycling has been at the forefront of changes, with cyclist numbers at levels not seen since before WW2. How has Paris changed so much, so fast, and what can we learn from each other…?
Hard to compare as both have a number of different boundaries radiating from the central area. The city of Paris, the area within the Boulevard Périphérique, is right in the centre; then there’s ‘Grand Paris’ (Métropole du Grand Paris), a recently created local authority that includes most of the urban landscape around Paris; and finally there’s the Region, Île-de-France, that is even larger and comprises many rural areas.
With its 8.9 million inhabitants, the Greater London area is perhaps best compared with Grand Paris and its population of 7 million. However, even with a very broadly comparable number of residents, it should be noted that Grand Paris is considerably smaller than London — 814km², compared to 1569km² — about half the size. The city of Paris itself is even more densely inhabited, with 2.1 million people living across its 105km².
“The fact that the Paris city mayor holds a strong and cohesive power within the Paris borders helps explain Hidalgo’s team's ability and success in delivering on so much active travel and public realm transformation.”
In Paris, private cars are used for 12% of all trips (4% in Paris city centre), while walking accounts for 52%, and public transport nearly a third. These figures differ greatly when looking at the Region, with most suburb-to-suburb journeys being taken by car — across Île-de-France car and motorbike trips represent 35% of trips.
In London, as of December 2023, cycling and walking trips are on the rise, private vehicle journeys are declining, and public transport growing back to pre-Covid levels. Cycle trips increased by 258% from 2000 to 2019, and estimates for 2022 show cycle and walk mode shares remaining higher than before the pandemic. Walking is at 27%, cycling at 4.5%, public transport at 31% and private transport at 38%. The mayor’s aim is for 80% of trips to be made by walking, cycling and public transport by 2041.
Most of Paris city and its nearest suburbs are densely built, with higher buildings, and often narrower streets. Away from the tourist hubs of central Paris, you can see that, on average, street space between buildings is much smaller and narrower than in London, so how that limited space is allocated is very important. With a very high population density, trips taken by people living within Paris city, and also within Grand Paris, tend to be very short — which means for most people getting to a shop or any form of local amenity is within walking distance. That doesn’t mean Paris is already a ’15-minute city’, certainly much less so in the suburbs, but when comparing with central London boroughs (apart from the City), there’s a clear difference.
In contrast, much of London is much less dense: vast areas of London are covered with terraced housing and two-way streets, usually with two sets of parking lanes.
In London, central boroughs have the lowest motoring rates with only 23% in the City, and 34% in Islington and Tower Hamlets. Yet 69% of households in outer London have access to, or own, at least one car or van, compared to 42% in inner London.
In Paris city, only 33.5% of households own a car. In some part this explains why it’s been easier for the elected leader to implement such aggressive policies on car parking space reduction: most of its voters do not own a car. But the figures rise to 64.5% for Grand Paris, and as much as 83% for the whole Ile-de-France.
Being in the EU means France has to abide by European health regulation and in 2018 France was asked by the European Commission to implement ambitious policies to reduce air pollution. One of these measures should have been the ZFE (zone à faibles émissions, literally ‘low emission zone’). The French State has been condemned by its own supreme court for not abiding by its own regulation regularly since 2021, and yet ZFEs that were due to be implemented in the 11 most polluted urban areas are still not really in place. Continued protests by the gilets jaunes movement is one of the key reasons for this hesitancy and delay by the State. Grand Paris is still supposed to ban old and polluting motor vehicles from January 2025 (after many postponements). However, there’s still no agreement on how this ban is going to be enforced and most commentators believe it’s going to be postponed again.
It’s the total opposite in London, where ULEZ has been a locally initiated policy, fully endorsed by the mayor — and widely supported by Londoners as shown this May as Khan increased his mandate and won a record third term in office. In Paris and its surrounds, such policy support is required by the State. So as London has its congestion charge and expanded ULEZ, Paris hasn’t left the starting blocks.
A London Underground Zone 1 single fare costs £2.70, while a monthly Zones 1-6 travelcard in London costs £299.60 (or £427.40 for Zones 1-9, a more accurate comparison of relative area covered).
In Paris a T+ ticket costs the equivalent of £1.50-£1.85. But at least 2.1 million people in Paris use a ‘passe Navigo’ throughout the year; for €88 per month, they can travel unlimited across the whole Region (Île-de-France) and for employees half of the monthly fee is paid by their company.
Transport for London says the Cycleway network — which includes routes that are mostly, but not continuously segregated or protected from vehicles — has grown from 90km in 2016 to 400km now. That total doesn’t include smaller, local routes, those in Low Traffic Neighbourhoods, mini-Holland schemes and other traffic-calmed areas, which are far more difficult to calculate.
Meanwhile, as the second part of its Plan Vélo (2021-2026) — from a total €250 million investment in cycling — Paris will gain 180km of new protected cycle lanes. 52km of these will convert temporary pandemic lanes into permanent ones. On top of this the plan is to develop 450km of streets as two-way for cycling, of which 60km have already been finished. So Paris will have roughly 300km of safe cycleways by the project’s completion, with a network of about 1,000km of ‘cyclable streets’ across the wider region.
Overseeing each city is a Mayor and a team of deputies. While not everything in Paris is plain sailing in terms of administration, the key difference is that the mayor has control of all the roads and public spaces. In London, the Mayor and TfL are responsible for just 5% of the Transport for London Road Network — approximately 590km of the 14,790km roads in London.
Paris political control
In Paris change began under Bertrand Delanoë, before Anne Hidalgo pushed things into overdrive. But in contrast to London, Paris city (the Mayor’s office, effectively) has a large and cohesive power over its public realm. Though it does not solely control the public transport system, it does have an overall control over roads and public places. The State (national government) can intervene from time to time, while the Préfecture de Police has been widely controversial on occasion too, blocking a few active travel schemes over the last decade.
Paris is divided into 20 arrondissements (nearest equivalent to London’s boroughs), that are the basis for the local mayoral elections — but these local representatives have quite limited powers over their territories. They can potentially delay and frustrate transformations, but have no legal blocking rights. And, as in London, there have been some obvious discrepancies in the quality of the cycling network delivered in particular, but not all, right-leaning arrondissements.
Governance gets much more complicated outside of the Paris city though. Parts of the road system are managed by the State, parts by the Departements (nearest equivalent to UK counties), parts by the many cities. On top of this, the Region’s administration financially supports the implementation of the cycling network, as it is the local authority in charge of transportation for the whole Île-de-France (the wider Paris region) — known as the Réseau VIF (Vélo Île-de-France), the network is meant to be a complement to the suburban trains network (RER).
Plus there’s also another level of inter-municipal cooperations that have to be factored in, some more helpful when it comes to delivering active travel policies than others. In short, the fact that the Paris city mayor holds a strong and (relatively) cohesive power within the Paris borders helps explain Hidalgo’s team’s ability and success in delivering on so much active travel and public realm transformation.
Paris owns its cycling master plan too — it has the right and ability to modify road layouts, parking spaces and suchlike as it sees fit.
However, crossing Paris’s boundaries can get really complicated, and the active travel experience in the outskirts varies a lot in terms of quality — just as London can often face issues when new cycle lanes cross from one borough to another.
London political control
In London much of the cycling-related work was kickstarted under Boris Johnson (though the hire bike scheme was unveiled by Ken Livingstone), before successor Sadiq Khan has progressed things further, extending existing schemes and ringfencing record investment.
When comparing Paris with London’s administration and its relative size, it would be like having Khan and TfL being the full masters of the City, Islington, Hackney, Hammersmith & Fulham, Haringey, Kensington & Chelsea, Lambeth, Lewisham and Newham, and managing all their roads.
Both cities have done great work on cycling and active travel over the last decade. While Paris has nudged ahead on some fronts, London has led on others — and what we see on the ground today is something we’d only previously seen in leading cycling cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam. Here’s to much more still to come…
This article was originally published in London Cyclist summer 2024, London Cycling Campaign’s exclusive member’s magazine. Join as a member today for quarterly copies of London Cyclist delivered to your door, free legal advice, discounts in independent bike shops across London, and much more…
LATEST NEWS
LCC Community Skills Summit
Boost your campaigning on active travel in your area with a day of talks, workshops & networking on Saturday 5 April
Read moreInterview with Dr Maartje Van Putten
The first leader of Dutch safe cycling movement Stop de Kindermoord - Stop the Child Murder - tells her story
Read moreLondon’s best-ever year for cycling
We’ve seen the highest ever number of daily cycle journeys in London at 1.33 million per day – equivalent to a third of all daily tube journeys.
Read moreJOIN THE MOVEMENT
LCC is highly effective because it's supported by more than 12,000 members. If you cycle in London please consider joining today. You'll be supporting our work and you'll get a huge range of benefits.
Keep up to date