fbpx
Skip navigation

LCC Makes London’s Lorries Safer

Tougher Direct Vision lorry standards come into force today, as LCC releases new map on lorry safety and driver training by borough.

Share

Share this page

LCC welcomes new life-saving measures to improve lorry drivers’ visibility and awareness of cyclists and pedestrians, but also calls for urgent action from councils to end a dangerous postcode lottery on further measures needed to improve driver training, vehicle safety and construction site standards across London.

From 28 October, lorries in London are set to become safer, with fewer blind spots and more technology to help drivers avoid collisions with cyclists and pedestrians due to an upgrade to the existing Direct Vision Standard (DVS) system.

This world-leading intervention is particularly vital given half of all cycling fatalities and 20% of pedestrian fatalities in London involve a lorry, despite such larger vehicles only representing 4% of vehicle mileage in the capital.

Speaking about the new standard, Victoria Lebrec, a lorry crash victim, said:

“Almost ten years ago I was run over by a lorry whilst cycling to work, and lost my leg as a result of the collision. I am certain that had the vehicle had better direct vision, or been fitted with some of the additional safety equipment now required, my crash would have been prevented.

Death and serious injuries involving HGVs have reduced in London since the DVS was introduced in 2021, and I'm hopeful that these new measures will prevent even more. TfL should be commended for this world-first scheme, and I'm grateful to LCC and the other road safety groups who have campaigned for its introduction.”

Support LCC's Work On Safer Lorries

LCC's campaigning on lorry safety is only possible with support from our members and cyclists in London . We've made huge progress but there's still much more to. Please make a donation to support this vital work; and help ensure lorries, and our roads, continue to become safer for cycling.

The New Standard

DVS determines how effectively lorry cab design reduces drivers’ blind spots. No other city in the world has yet mandated a similar safety standard, and it is backed by evidence that the existing scheme has already helped reduce fatal collisions with cyclists and pedestrians involving driver vision by 75%.

From the 28th, the standard needed for a lorry in London moves from a minimum of ‘one star’ without mitigating sensors and other protective measures, to ‘three star’ vision. And more sensors and other measures are now required of those lorries with below three-star direct vision.

This diagram illustrates the features that must be fitted to any lorry below a Three-Star rating (image courtesy TfL).

LCC Raises Concern About Councils’ Inaction

While celebrating the new higher DVS standard, LCC is also raising serious concerns about some councils’ inaction on lorry safety, that risks undermining progress towards the Mayor’s target to end road deaths on London’s streets.

A new map published today reveals a postcode lottery on the provision of lorry driver training and support across London’s boroughs, laying bare a dangerously patchy level of support to improve lorry safety.

London Council Lorry Safety Ratings Further Information

Barking and Dagenham

  • Rating: 0 Barking Council is neither a FORS or CLOCS member. The Council says reference to FORS or CLOCS in procurement and planning terms is not applicable to them because the work is done by others.

Barnet

  • Rating: 3 Barnet is FORS bronze grade. Procurement for Brent Cross did require FORS membership for contractors and Brent says FORS and CLOCS will be required in future procurements. But the council told us that ‘There are no planning specific conditions which require the developers or their contractors to be FORS graded, CLOCS members or use one-star DVS lorries.’

Bexley

  • Rating: 0 Bexley is neither a FORS or CLOCS member and the council told us they were not aware of any tenders referring to FORS or CLOCS.

Brent

  • Rating: 3.5 Brent is neither a FORS or CLOCS member but the council says major developments require a Construction Logistics Plan which in turn specifies FORS and CLOCS as a requirement for contractors. Its waster contractor Veolia is FORS Bronze grade.

Bromley

  • Rating: 1 Bromley is neither a FORS or CLOCS member. The council says its terms for refuse contracts specify FORS and Veolia, its contractor, is graded Bronze. The Council did not say if any planning terms specified FORS or CLOCS.

Camden

  • Rating: 7.5 Camden is a CLOCS member and FORS registered but not yet graded. Its refuse contractor, Veolia, is FORS bronze grade and its maintenance contractor, Ideverde, is FORS Silver grade. The borough requires FORS (Bronze) and CLOCS for all major construction works in the borough as well as driver training (included in FORS Silver and CLOCS).

City of London

  • Rating: 9 City of London is both FORS Gold graded and a CLOCS member. All contractors must be FORS Silver graded. The City says “Whilst there are no specific planning conditions relating to driver qualification or vehicle type, we do normally require deconstruction and construction management plans which include such details, in accordance with TfL requirements. The City of London’s Code of Practice for Deconstruction and Construction sites references these requirements.”

Croydon

  • Rating: 6.5 Croydon is a CLOCS but not a FORS member. It requires both FORS Silver grade and CLOCS for contractors and developers working on major developments (more than 9 units) in the borough.

Ealing

  • Rating: 3 Ealing is neither a FORS nor CLOCS member. Its construction contractor is FORS Gold graded and the council specfies FORS in larger contracts that are reviewed by TfL.

Enfield

  • Rating: 0 Enfield is neither a FORS nor CLOCS member and did not provide any information about planning or procurement conditions that specify FORS or CLOCS.

Greenwich

  • Rating: 5 Greenwich is FORS Bronze grade but not a CLOCS member. It requires developers to submit Construction Logistics Plans which state if they are ” using operators committed to best practice (members of TfL’s Freight Operator Recognition Scheme, Construction Logistics and Community Safety (CLOCS) standard, or similar).”

Hackney

  • Rating: 3/10 Hackney says it is not a FORS member but is a CLOCS member. The borough says that it does not have a standardised New Build Design Specification or Employers’ Requirements that specify CLOCS membership or FORS grading, however, individual contracts may stipulate that requirement.

Hammersmith and Fulham

  • Rating: 5.5 Hammersmith and Fulham is a CLOCS member but not FORS graded. The Council says it “requires all Construction Logistic Plans (CLP) secured through the planning process to be in accordance with TfL guidance. Which includes a requirement for all fleet to be FORS graded and CLOCS members.”

Haringey

  • Rating: 6 Haringey is a CLOCS member but not FORS graded. Procurement contracts may specify FORS Silver and some developments may require CLOCS. A recent review of Construction Logistics Plans now requires them “to conform with Transport for London’s Construction Logistics Planning Guidance (2021) which was developed with CLOCS.”

Harrow

  • Rating: 2 Harrow is not a FORS or CLOCS member. Neither FORS nor CLOCS are standardised requirements in contracts but they may be stipulated. The Council says “when we request a Construction Logistics Plan (which is usually conditioned), most often, we will want to see that the contractor agrees to use FORS graded vehicles and ideally DVS compliance too.”

Havering

  • Rating: 2 Havering is not a FORS or CLOCS member. Some procurement and planning terms specify FORS grading and require reaching Silver grade withing 12 months.

Hillingdon

  • Rating: 2 Hillingdon is not a FORS or CLOCS member but it requests compliance with the standards of the Considerate Constructor Scheme, which advises adoption of CLOCS and FORS standards. The council says “Where applicable, planning conditions are included requiring developers or their contractors to be FORS graded.”

Hounslow

  • Rating: 6 Hounslow is a CLOCS champion for regulation but not FORS graded. Its planning conditions require a Construction Logistics Plan to be set out in the CLOCS format and which specifies that contractors must be minimum FORS Silver graded and that the developer and their contractors follow CLOCS guidance.

Islington

  • Rating: 5 Islington is not a FORS or CLOCS member. The council’s procurement terms require contractors “to comply with CLOCS National Standards before commencing the Works”. The council’s Code of Construction practice for relevant developments “requires developers to ensure that contractors and sub-contractors working on construction sites in Islington are FORS graded Silver or higher and are registered as CLOCS champions.”

Kensington and Chelsea

  • Rating: 3.5 Kensington and Chelsea is not a member of FORS or CLOCS. Developments that may cause traffic disruption must provide a Construction Traffic Management Plan which requires FORS Silver accreditation. Direct vision is required indirectly via the requirement for the FORS Silver accreditation.

Kingston upon Thames

  • Rating: 2 Kingston is not a FORS or CLOCS member. The council’s re-procurement terms specify FORS Silver for contractors but current contractors are either FORS Bronze or awaiting grading. The council did not provide information about planning requirements.

Lambeth

  • Rating: 3.5 Lambeth is FORS Bronze graded but not a CLOCS champion. Its main waste contractor Serco is FORS Silver graded. Planning conditions are decided on a case by case basis. The council says “There is no standard condition that is applied to permissions requiring FORS accreditation, CLOCS memberships or for vehicles to meet a minimum DVS star rating.”

Lewisham

  • Rating: 0 Lewisham is not a FORS or CLOCS member. There are no procurement or planning requirements in Lewisham that mandate the meeting FORS or CLOCS standards. The council says its own lorries meet a three star Direct Vision Standard.

Merton

  • Rating: 4 Merton is not a FORS or CLOCS member but says its refuse and recycling contractor, Veolia, is FORS Gold graded – this is incorrect, the firm is Bronze graded. The council says new contracts require that ‘all vehicles are compliant with Freight Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) Silver standard from commencement of contract.’ On the planning side Merton says “For major schemes we promote CLOCS and FORS; contained as part of Construction Management Plans secured by condition.”

Newham

  • Rating: 1 Newham is not a FORS or CLOCS member. Neither its procurement terms nor planning currently mandate FORS or CLOCS but its planning applications direct applicants to the CLOCS Construction Logistics Plan guidance. The council says “The emerging Local Plan and Construction Logistic Guidance will provide further guidance, recommending accreditation to FORS and CLOCS.”

Redbridge

  • Rating: 1 Redbridge is not a FORS or CLOCS member but says it is reviewing its options on membership of FORS or another standard. It also says it stipulates “that suppliers are accredited to FORS and CLOCS as part of our procurement where applicable.”

Richmond upon Thames

  • Rating: 5 Richmond is FORS Bronze graded but not a CLOCS member. It says its term contractor, FM Conway is FORS graded Gold (although it is currently listed as Silver) and is expected to be a CLOCS participant. On planning policy Richmond requires Construction Management Plans and says “There may be no absolute necessity to be members of FORS or CLOCS but it is generally expected that construction contractors will be members of such schemes or demonstrate practices as if they were members.”

Southwark

  • Rating: 5 Southwark is not FORS graded but it is a CLOCS member, according to CLOCS. Suppliers may be required to be FORS graded. The council’s Construction Environmental Management Plan requires membership of the Considerate Constructors Scheme and “employing transport operators with “Silver” standard FORS.”

Sutton

  • Rating: 0.5 Sutton is neither a FORS or CLOCS member and does not require FORS or CLOCS in its planning and procurement terms. It says: “We have a very small fleet as most services requiring vehicles, for example, waste services and parks are outsourced, we do not currently require FORS accreditation.”

Tower Hamlets

  • Rating: 6 Tower Hamlets is not FORS graded but it is a CLOCS member. It requires construction vehicles working in the borough to be FORS Silver graded. Planning requirements for larger developments state: “Construction management plans and/or delivery and servicing plans are required to show how the Construction Logistics and Community Safety (CLOCS) standard has been incorporated and that fleets serving the site have Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) silver accreditation.”

Waltham Forest

  • Rating: 5 Waltham Forest is a CLOCS member but not FORS graded. It says “Detailed Construction Logistics Plans in Waltham Forest require developers to meet a minimum of FORS Silver, in line with CLOCS guidance. The requirement for FORS Silver is not specifically worded in planning conditions, however for a Construction Logistics Plan to be approved as a planning condition, the developer is expected to include this wording.”

Wandsworth

  • Rating: 5 Wandsworth is FORS Bronze graded but not a CLOCS member. It say its term contractor, FM Conway is FORS graded Gold (although it is currently Silver) and is expected to be a CLOCS participant. On planning policy Wandsworth requires Construction Management Plans and says “There may be no absolute necessity to be members of FORS or CLOCS but it is generally expected that construction contractors will be members of such schemes or demonstrate practices as if they were members.”

Westminster

  • Rating: 4 Westminster is not a FORS or CLOCS member. However all major developments must adhere to the “Council’s Code of Construction Practice, which requires all vehicles and their drivers servicing construction sites within the borough to be bound by the conditions laid out in the CLOCS or FORS Silver Standard as a minimum.”

The map shows a vast gulf in approach being taken on lorry safety by councils, based on their contracted operators, sub-contractors and planning requirements for road safety around major developments. This includes 4 councils – Barking and Dagenham, Bexley, Enfield, and Lewisham receiving a zero rating on LCC’s assessment of their contracts.

While the new three-star DVS standard is mandatory across London, councils can also add planning and procurement requirements to their contracts to ensure their fleet operators and in-house vehicle fleets add driver training, vehicle safety and building site standards.

These are known as “FORS” (Fleet Operators Recognition Scheme) and “CLOCS” (Construction Logistics and Community Safety) and are recommended by TfL and already widely used by many leading haulage and construction firms.

Speaking on the need for councils to go further, Dr Nedah Darabi, lorry collision survivor, GP and Trustee of London Cycling Campaign said:

“I am delighted that the Mayor and TfL have improved the lorry DVS standard and hope this will lead to fewer people like me and their communities being affected by preventable life-changing injuries and deaths.

Unfortunately, there continues to be a patchwork picture of action across London boroughs highlighting the urgent need for every council to do more on road danger, faster. The lorries and drivers in their fleets could easily be made safer tomorrow and failing to do so will lead to unnecessary injuries and deaths.”

More than 4,500 firms that operate lorries are already FORS members and more than 300 are CLOCS “champions”. Yet LCC’s research via Freedom of Information requests, publicly available data and contact with councils found that five councils still do not require (by becoming FORS graded or CLOCS champions) safety standards through their planning or procurement terms and thus receive a zero rating on our new CLOCS/FORS map, while four receive a high rating.

  • The boroughs in the lowest-scoring red (zero or zero point five) categories are Barking and Dagenham, Bexley, Enfield, Lewisham and Sutton.
  • Those in the highest-scoring green categories (a score of six or above) are Camden, City of London, Croydon, Haringey, Hounslow and Tower Hamlets.

The map rates councils on whether they are either FORS or CLOCS members themselves and/or are using procurement contracts and planning regulations to ensure drivers under their responsibility are well-trained and drive vehicles that have full safety equipment.

Councils are scored on CLOCS, FORS and contract quality from zero to ten and the colouring reflects scores from green (good) to red (poor). We will update the map regularly as councils contact us to confirm new procurement and planning terms.

 

More information on the new DVS

DVS is an outcome of consistent campaigning by LCC and its members and supporters, who signed multiple petitions and put safer lorries on the agenda of first Mayor Boris Johnson and then Mayor Sadiq Khan.

In 2016 our campaigning won an agreement from Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan to get the most dangerous lorries off the road. The DVS standard is the result.

From 28 October, lorries driven in London will have to meet a new, more stringent, safety standard or their operators will face fines of up to £550. The existing DVS permit system that applies to all 12 tonne or larger goods vehicles operating in London moves from a one-star minimum to three-stars.

Vehicles that are not three-star DVS rated will have to have more cameras and alert systems called the “Progressive Safe System” installed. This will improve visibility of people directly in front of and to the left of the lorry as well as preventing false alarms when passing stationary objects.

The first iteration of the Direct Vision Standard (DVS), launched on 1 March 2021, required all operators of large freight and construction vehicles to achieve either a ‘one star’ rating or fit additional sensors, cameras and other measures to increase vision around the cab and/or safety around the vehicle.

The new update to three-stars means operators must now either upgrade their lorries to ones with better direct vision or upgrade their camera and sensor technology to the improved Progressive Safe System.

In other words, not only is the direct vision standard increasing, but the ‘mitigation’ measures are also more stringent.

By installing a Moving Off Information System, required under the PSS regulations, the sensor system will be able to detect all pedestrians shown in the image, green and red, and warn the driver of their presence.

While Three-Star DVS regulations are in force from October 28th, operators who register for a permit before that date are allowed a grace period to install a Progressive Safe System by May 2025.

This is to enable installers to handle the volume of work. LCC and other road safety campaigners successfully argued against an extension of the grace period to 2026.

Discover LCC and lorries

Lorries drive just 4% of vehicle miles in London but are involved in over half of fatal collisions with cyclists. We campaign to design out danger.

JOIN THE MOVEMENT

LCC is highly effective because it's supported by more than 12,000 members. If you cycle in London please consider joining today. You'll be supporting our work and you'll get a huge range of benefits.

Keep up to date

All the latest cycling news, campaigns and information straight to your inbox.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Children cycling with legs out - kids playing